Our donation for disputed shop owner?

S N Gaur

In my Society present committee sought donations from we members to pay water charges of disputed shop owner.

In the year 2011, Shop owner brought Administrator on the strength of non filing of M-20 Bond.

Dissolving committee in his subsequent AGM was suppose to levy water bill of 2, 30,000/-which he had taken in unauthorised manner by taking connection from Bathroom of society.

He filed a suit in Co operative Court also.

Newly elected committee now giving all the liberal cooperation to that Shop keepers & others also who are running Hotels without License & storing oils of combustible , hazardous nature .

Committee has taken REDEVELOPMENT as there only motto.Hence for this only motto MC is breaking all the Bye laws , legitimate rights of members are overlooked.Penalising the old MC members, No transparencies in any CHS matter is observed.

MC has collected donations from all the Shopkeepers to pay waterbills which is a Court Matter.

On Notice board appeal was put up before all resistant members to give voluntary donation.

On this 14th Aug.MC has paid waterbill  a) from donation so collected.

b ) Balance amount  perhaps from

Society’s account also.

c ) Legal fees has also not yet been paid.

MC says that in forthcoming AGM they will explain this issue to all members.

Now my question is :

1) Can MC decide in the matter of its own .I doubt case is not yet withdrawn & payment is made.

2 ) Being a CHS Society how MC can appeal for Donation to members.Still there are few more defaulters too exists.

3 ) Who will bear the Legal expenses Society  incurred because of that Shopkeeper who went to the court just to harass the than committee.

4 ) Is not this committee working illegally ?

5 ) What remedies we have in such type of mal- functioning & illegal functionality of MC.

WE dedicated member who really find  ourselves in very remote situation seek encouragement from you.

I C Naik

Few points

1. MC may appeal for donation and members may voluntarily pay also. Nothing wrong.

2.The MC has taken certain steps (which may appear illegal but until proved, it is not healthy to reach conclusions. Members are assured that they will be informed of these matters in AGM. So far so good.

3. There is a Court case in which no need to lose faith.

Exit mobile version