Query of Babulal Khandelwal

Sir, I   made a complaint on 26.09.2014 with the commissioner ,cooperation Pune as under : The society is managed by non-qualified members under  rule 56M of MCS Rules 1961 of which the term expired in August 2013.On 0708.2014 A retired assistant registrar of coop. societies and committee members conspired who prepared and publish a Notice signed as Returning Officer for conducting election of M C.The Returning officer disobeyed direction of commissioner and did not follow sub rule 4&5 Bye law 116(a). I brought the facts to his notice and intimated to the Dy. Registrar. The retired Assistant Register ,a qualified senior officer well versed with all laws but done an illegal act entered with an agreement for conducting of M C elections was a party to a Criminal Conspiracy committed an offence  under the Prevention of Corruptions Act 1988 accepted  an amount from the society. This is an  interest of the society paid a buck for their personal gain.

Commissioner issued a letter to the DDR for necessary action under intimation to the complainant. With several correspondence and personal meetings with DDR as well Dy. Registrar. Now  Hearing is fixed  myself as complainant and Returning officer & society ‘s secretary as Defendants. Kindly through more light and suggest the ways to get penalized both  parties under  criminal  offence.

I C Naik

File an RTI application to PIO State Cooperative Election Authprity Pune. Information you have to ask for is the name of the Returning officer who conducted election in 2014 to elect new Committee. Copy of the order authorising him to hold elections.  The Answer will bring out if the Officer conduction election was empowered or did on his own. If it is found that he was doing it on his own theb you have fool proof case.

Exit mobile version