Dilip’s views are not clear

Dilip

Got the views of Mr.I.C.Naik  thru ur mail dt.30th Sept.2015 in response of my mail dt.4th April,2015.Grateful for the same.

Earnest request from a ailing Sr./Citizen to have legal views on the following early:-(1)Reg.requirement of unconditional consent from all 320 members towards extension.(2) Will sec.441 I.P.C.be a bar to such extension without having consent from all.(3)Is there any judgement of Supreme Court in such case or similar such cases.If,there are ,then I may kindly be favoured with the xerox copies of those judgements by courier post.I will bear the total cost in advance thru NEFT on hearing from ur end & getting S.B.A/C No.& name,name of bank & branch,IFS Code etc as required.

VALUED & WELL JUDGED VIEWS OF MR.NAIK WOULD BE GIVEN DUE HONOUR.

 I C Naik

The following is not clear to me.

“Got the views of Mr.I.C.Naik  thru ur mail dt.30th Sept.2015 in response of my mail dt.4th April,2015.Grateful for the same.

Exit mobile version